Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Jan 5;38(20):2016–2027. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1111435

Table 2.

Transitions between Baseline and 2-year Follow-up by Gender

Progression of Disability at baseline (2001) Progression of Disability at 2-year follow-up (2003) Other Options Number of Subjects
Gender No Disability Mobility Only Mobility & IADL Mobility & ADL All Three Dead Lost to Follow-Up Other Combinations
No Disability M 60.8% 22.0% 2.6% 2.2% 0.9% 4.9% 5.6% 1.0% 1,014
F 47.7% 28.4% 4.7% 3.5% 5.5% 2.8% 6.5% 0.9% 779
Mobility Only M 36.1% 35.5% 8.2% 3.9% 3.5% 7.5% 3.7% 1.6% 556
F 33.7% 38.4% 7.5% 6.8% 5.1% 4.8% 3.0% 0.7% 771
Mobility & IADL M 25.0% 38.3% 3.4% 5.6% 8.8% 18.9% 0.0% 0.0% 54
F 14.6% 37.3% 13.5% 2.0% 20.1% 10.2% 0.1% 2.2% 161
Mobility & ADL M 11.3% 39.5% 8.5% 17.9% 7.0% 14.4% 1.4% 0.0% 122
F 20.9% 33.7% 6.4% 14.4% 12.4% 6.1% 5.6% 0.5% 145
All Three M 2.2% 15.9% 5.2% 5.6% 27.5% 31.1% 12.5% 0.0% 120
F 4.5% 21.2% 8.0% 8.0% 23.6% 32.3% 2.4% 0.0% 237
Other M 75.4% 11.0% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 0.4% 7.4% 29
F 11.3% 24.3% 0.9% 0.9% 9.8% 11.9% 40.9% 0.0% 17

Note: Weighted percentages and unweighted totals. Percentages add up to 100% for each row. Unweighted sample size is 4,005 (1,895 males and 2,110 females).

Source: Author’s calculations with data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study [36, 37].