Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2017 Jun;101(6):1234–1241. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001310

Table 3.

Inflation adjusted and outcomes discounted cost-effectiveness analysis based on induction regimens for low and high-risk recipients.

Strategy Cost (C), 2013 USD value Incremental Cost, 2013 USD value Effect (E), years Incremental Effect, years C/E ICER
LOW-RISK*
Alemtuzumab 125,316 2.64 47.468
r-ATG 136,185 10,869 2.64 0.00 51,585
HIGH-RISK
IL2-RA 154,088 2.43 63,410
r-ATG 159,894 5,806 2.48 0.05 64,473 116,120
High-risk subcategories
PRA>20%
IL2-RA 154,268 2.43 63,484
r-ATG 157,567 3,299 2.49 0.06 63,279 54,983
KDPI> 50%
IL2-RA 162,431 2.38 68,243
r-ATG 167,160 4,729 2.42 0.04 69,074 118,225
CIT>24 hours
IL2-RA 153,999 2.46 62,601
Alemtuzumab 158,686 4,687 2.56 0.10 61,986 46,870
Age> 60 years-old
IL2-RA 156,990 2.41 65,141
r-ATG 163,100 6,110 2.47 0.06 66,032 101,833
African American*
Alemtuzumab 152,918 2.51 60,924
r-ATG 161,772 8,854 2.49 0.02 64,968
*

The ICER is not included. The ICER is not defined for the low risk group because the incremental health effects among alemtuzumab and r-ATG is zero (division by zero). In the African American category, alemtuzumab is marginally dominant strategy.