Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;283(1833):20160443. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0443

Table 2.

Model choice for colonization scenarios of Peponapis pruinosa into eastern North America based on the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) analysis. Scenario 1 assumes a southerly range extension from Mexico through the east coast. Scenario 2 assumes the expansion passaged through the Great Plains (Midwest), then eastward to the Atlantic coast. Scenario 3 assumes that migrants from the east coast and the Midwest colonized northeastern North America. See figure 2 for details.

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
posterior probabilitya 0.043 [0.017–0.048] 0.643 [0.607–0.678] 0.325 [0.290–0.360]
confidence in scenario choiceb
 type I error 0.201
 type II error 0.105 0.283
number of outlying statisticsc
 p < 0.05 4 3 6
p < 0.01 1 0 0
p < 0.001 0 0 0

aThe median and 95% confidence intervals of the posterior probability indicate the revised probability distribution of each scenario after taking into consideration the prior information of the model.

bModel performance of best scenario. Type I error indicates the probability with which the best model is rejected. Type II error indicates the probability of deciding for best scenario when it is not true.

cThe number of summary statistics significantly different than the observed data. These statistics were used to discriminate between competing scenarios.