Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;16:527. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3179-6

Table 3.

Main intention to treat analyses of effect of Walk Well programme on primary and secondary outcomes assessed immediately after end of programme (12 weeks)

Walk Well Control Main between group comparison
Outcomes N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) Mean difference at 12-weeks (95 % CI)a p ICC
Primary outcome
Step count per day 42 4823 (2059) 40 4784 (2613) 69.5 (-1054 , 1193.3) 0.90 0.51
Secondary outcomes
Percentage time per day MVPA 42 3.0 (2.6) 40 3.1 (2.1) 0.3 (-0.7 , 1.3) 0.55 0.42
Percentage time per day sedentary 42 66.4 (10.0) 40 65.9 (12.0) 1.6 (-3.0 , 6.1) 0.49 0.22
Total MET minutes per week 37 1311.9 (1293.2) 37 1154.8 (1103.7) 56.0 (-428.8,540.9) 0.82 0.02
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 43 32.1 (7.7) 43 32.9 (7.5) −0.2 (-0.83,0.41) 0.49 0.00
Waist circumference (cm) 45 104.9 (16.9) 42 107.8 (17.8) −1.6 (-3.93,0.64) 0.15 0.00
Subjective vitality (mean score) 39 14.6 (2.5) 35 14.3 (2.8) 0.3 (-0.85, 1.52) 0.57 0.00
Self-efficacy (mean score) 43 14.4 (3.0) 42 13.7 (3.7) 0.8 (-0.68, 2.22) 0.29 0.08
EQ-5D (mean health utility score) 44 0.8 (0.27) 43 0.7 (0.30) 0.0 (-0.09, 0.14) 0.70 0.00

SD standard deviation, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, EQ-5D European quality of Life 5 Dimensions, MET metabolic equivalents, MVPA moderate vigorous physical activity; aBetween group mixed effects model adjusted for cluster and baseline value