Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158473

Table 2. OR and 95% CI for maternal services utilization.

Characteristics ORm (95% CI) for model 1 ORm (95% CI) for model 2 ORm (95% CI) for model 3
Before or after compensation scheme adjustment
Year
2008 1 1 1
2011 3.41 (0.62,18.81) 3.32 (1.35,8.15)** 2.32 (1.10,4.91)*
Socio-demographics
Age
≤ 29 years 1 1 1
> 29 years 1.28 (0.25,6.47) 0.48 (0.19,1.22) 1.40 (0.57,3.40)
Education
≤ Secondary level 1 1 1
> Secondary level 12.79 (0.53,14.75) 1.50 (0.63,3.57) 3.95 (1.88,8.31)***
Employment
Employed 1 1 1
Unemployed 2.45 (0.41,14.54) 0.68 (0.16,2.97) 1.25 (0.37,4.32)
Annual household income
< 60000 Yuan 1 1 1
≥ 60000 Yuan 1.70 (0.37,7.76) 1.80 (0.75,4.32) 1.11 (0.51,2.39)
Maternal health care status
Parity
Multiparous 1 1 1
Primiparous 1.71 (0.37,7.76) 2.81 (0.99,7.93) 0.81 (0.29,2.22)

ORm: odds ratio of multivariate logistic analysis; Model 1, 2, and 3: In model 1, the dependant variable was the proportion of prenatal care at least 5 times; in model 2, the dependant variable was proportion of postnatal visits; in model 3, the dependant variable was proportion of delivery in the secondary and above institutions

*p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001.