Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158661

Fig 7. Network meta-analysis for success and complication rates according to SWL frequency and node-splitting analyses of inconsistency.

Fig 7

(A) The success rates of low- (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.5–3.6) and intermediate-frequency SWL (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3–4.6) were higher than high-frequency SWL on the network analyses. (B) In terms of the complication rate, there were no differences across all SWL frequency groups. On node-splitting analysis, no comparisons demonstrated inconsistency between direct and indirect comparison in terms of success and complication rates. P-value: inconsistency p-values for each split comparison. Direct: direct comparison between two treatments. Indirect: indirect comparison between two treatments. Network: network meta-analysis between two treatments