Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158848

Table 5. Subgroup meta-analysis results of rtPA’s effect on infarction volume.

Subgroups No. of studies (animals) SMDs (95% CI) Within-group heterogeneity Effect of subgroup
Chi2 within p-value %variance explaineda) Chi2 between p-value %variance explainedb)
Ischemic model
filament 4 (67) 0.37 (-1.48 to 2.21) 23.8 0.000 87%
ligation 2 (24) 0.67 (-1.82 to 3.15) 6.92 0.009 86% 0.04 0.85 0.12%
Duration of ischemia
permenant 3 (36) 0.72 (-0.70 to 2.13) 7.32 0.030 73%
transient 3 (55) 0.01 (-2.70 to 2.72) 23.38 0.000 91% 0.2 0.65 1.98%
Evaluation methodology
TTC 5 (79) 0.37 (-1.33 to 2.06) 32.89 0.000 88%
HE 1 (12) 0.52 (-0.18 to 1.21) - - - 0.25 0.62 1.88%
STAIR score
< = 3 2 (43) 1.87 (1.12 to 2.61) 0.04 0.850 0%
> = 4 4 (48) -0.35 (-2.38 to 1.67) 22.47 0.000 87% 4.06 0.04 12.34%

A positive value of SMD means that tPA deficient mice has decreased infarction volume and endogenous tPA presents neurotoxicity after ischemic stroke.

SMD, standardized means difference; CI, confidence interval; TTC, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride; HE, hematoxylin eosin staining; STAIR, Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable.

a) Percentage of variance within group explained by heterogeneity is given by I2.

b) Percentage of variance explained by moderator variable is given by Chi2 between/Chi2 total, where Chi2 total = 32.91.