Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Asthma. 2013 May 9;50(6):672–680. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.792351

Table 3.

Base case cost analysis of a hypothetical cohort (n = 49,290) of persistent asthmatics in each environmental strategy. Direct and indirect costs saved by the intervention were calculated from the baseline number of units in the no intervention group. All costs are in 2009 US dollars.

Parameter Net intervention Costs (US$) Urgent care clinic visits (averted)
ER visits (averted)
Hospitalizations (averted)
Lost days of work (averted)
Travel days (averted)
Total averted costs per cohort-year ($US) Total net savings per cohort-year (US$)
Costs (US$ saved) Costs (US$ saved) costs) (US$ saved) Costs (US$ saved) Costs (US $ saved)
No intervention       –    49290
      –
   10893
      –
   2412
      –
   67419
      –
   62595
      –
      –
Environmental education by non-medical providers $9.6 million (95% SI: $5.9, 13.3 million)    31053
$3.1 million
   4793
$2.9 million
   1713
$9.1 million
   40985
$7.1 million
   37559
$600 thousand
$22.8 million $13.2 million (95% SI: $.210, 21.0 million)
Environmental education by non-medical providers $ 7.3 million (95% SI: $4.5, 10.1 million)    32532
$3.3 million
   6100
$3.8 million
   1206
$6.4 million
   42250
$ 7.3 million
   39838
$600 thousand
$21.4 million $14.1 million (95% SI: $ .283, 19.4 million)
Environmental education by non-medical providers, allergen impermeable covers, pest management $14.3 million (95% SI: $8.8, 20.0 million)    17744
$1.8 million
   6863
$4.4 million
   2002
$10.6 million
   30613
$5.2 million
   26609
$400 thousand
$22.4 million $8.1 million (95% SI: $ 4.9, 15.9 million)