Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr 1;150(1):169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.045

TABLE 3.

Electrographic seizure predictors

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis no. 1*
Multivariate analysis no. 2*
No seizures Seizures P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Gender .80
 Male 85 (92%) 7 (8%)
 Female 63 (91%) 6 (9%)
Gestational age (wk) 39 (38–39) 37 (37–39) .42
Identified genetic abnormality .55
 None 128 (91%) 12 (9%)
 Present 20 (95%) 1 (5%)
Age at surgery (d) 5 (3–7) 3 (2–5) .05 0.91 (0.74–1.11) .36 0.93 (0.77–1.28) .47
Cardiac defect .14
 Class I 65 (96%) 3 (4%) 0.46 (0.10–2.18) .33 1.09 (0.18–6.67) .93
 Class II 33 (94%) 2 (6%) 0.49 (0.08–2.87) .43 0.41 (0.07–2.43) .33
 Class III 14 (93%) 1 (7%) 0.76 (0.07–7.83) .82 2.28 (0.14–35.06) .56
 Class IV 36 (84%) 7 (16%)
Operation .42
 Stage 1 Norwood Operation 37 (86%) 6 (14%)
 Arterial switch operation 24 (96%) 1 (4%)
 Systemic to pulmonary artery shunt 16 (94%) 1 (6%)
 Complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot 14 (100%) 0 (0%)
 Truncus arteriosus repair 11 (92%) 1 (8%)
Delayed sternal closure .002 3.99 (1.04–15.29) .04 * *
 No 128 (95%) 7 (5%)
 Yes 20 (77%) 6 (23%)
Duration of DHCA (min) 21 (0–42) 47 (36–49) .01 * * 1.04 (1.00–1.08) .04
Duration of CPB (min) 45 (38–60) 62 (42–77) .24
ECMO* .015
 No 140 (93%) 10 (7%)
 Yes 9 (73%) 3 (27%)
Cardiac arrest* .006
 No 137 (94%) 9 (6%)
 Yes 11 (73%) 4 (27%)

Number (%) and median (IQR) are reported as appropriate. Boldface indicates statistical significance. OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; DHCA, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

*

Delayed sternal closure and DHCA duration were highly correlated, so multivariate analysis included only delayed sternal closure (multivariable analysis no. 1) or DHCA duration (multivariable analysis no. 2).

ECMO and cardiac arrest were not included in the multivariable analysis because these variables would not be known at the time of return to the CICU and therefore could not be used to help decide whether EEG monitoring was indicated.