Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):1073–1081. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001600

TABLE 2.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients With Circulating Tumor Cells With a Mesenchymal-like Phenotype

Variable CK+Vim+ CTCs (n = 26) No CK+Vim+ CTCs (n = 24) P**
Average age (yrs)  64.5 (27–85) 65.3 (40–86) 0.62
Male sex     19 (73%)    11 (46%) 0.11
Resectable disease     22 (85%)    22 (92%) 0.44
Tumor size (cm)    2.9 (0.1–8)   3.2 (0.2–6.3) 0.29
Average CA19-9 level (n = 39) 1189 (1–9032)  704 (0.6–7312) 0.88
CA19-9 level (n = 39) 0.61
 High >36     15 (58%)      5 (38%)
 Low <36     11 (42%)      8 (62%)
Tumor grade/differentiation 0.64
 Well/moderate     12 (50%)    14 (64%)
 Poor     12 (50%)      8 (36%)
 Not specified        2       2
Perineural invasion     17 (77%)    20 (83%) 0.60
Perivascular invasion     11 (50%)    16 (67%) 0.83
Positive lymph nodes     17 (77%)    18 (78%) 0.25
Positive margin       5 (23%)      6 (27%) 0.41
Stage*   —
 Stage I       4 (15%)      4 (17%)
 Stage II     18 (70%)    20 (83%)
 Stage III       0 (0%)      0 (0%)
 Stage IV       4 (15%)      0 (0%)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy       9 (35%)      7 (29%) 0.81
Adjuvant chemotherapy     19 (73%)    17 (71%) 0.97
SMAD4 (n = 46) 0.45
 Intact     12 (50%)    12 (55%)
 Lost     12 (50%)    10 (45%)
TP53 (n = 46) 0.36
 Normal expression       8 (33%)      8 (33%)
 Abnormal     16 (67%)    16 (67%)

Comparisons were performed for patients with and without cytokeratin-positive and vimentin-positive CTCs (CK+Vim+CTCs). Values are n (%) or mean (range).

*

P values for stage were not calculated given the small number of patients with stage I and IV disease, and that all patients with no mesenchymal-like CTCs had stage II disease.

**

P values from linear or logistic regression models for the association between the given patient characteristics and vimentin group while adjusting for whether the patient had cytokeratin-positive CTCs.