Abstract
Aim:
Objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different levels of iodine supplementation on iodine content of eggs in laying hens.
Materials and Methods:
In the experiment, 135 laying hens (White Leghorn) of 55 weeks age were randomly distributed to 5 dietary treatments; each group contained 27 laying hens distributed in three replicates of 9 birds each. Diet T1 was control basal layer diet without iodine enrichment in which iodine content (I2) was as per NRC recommendation. Basal diets were supplemented with calcium iodate (Ca (IO3)2) at 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/kg in T2, T3, T4 and T5 groups, respectively. The iodine content in the calcium iodate is 65.21%, therefore, the diets T2, T3, T4 and T5 contained 3.25, 6.50, 9.75 and 13.0 ppm iodine, respectively. The laying hens were fed the respective experimental diets ad libitum during the experimental period of 10-week. The iodine content of egg yolk and albumen was analyzed at the end of 5th and 10th week of the experiment. Economics of feeding for the production of iodine enriched egg was calculated at the end of the experiment.
Results:
Increasing iodine levels in diet of hens from 0.45 to 13.0 ppm significantly increased egg iodine concentration, the highest concentration of egg iodine was observed in the group fed diet supplemented with 13.0 ppm iodine followed by those fed 9.75, 6.50, 3.25 and 0.45 ppm iodine in diet. There was no significant difference in the iodine levels of unboiled versus boiled eggs. Therefore, the consumers are ensured to receive the optimal levels of iodine from boiled iodine-enriched eggs. Among different diets, minimum and significantly lower feeding cost (Rs. per dozen or per kg eggs) was noticed in hens allotted T3 diet (6.50 ppm I2). However, feeding cost of hens receiving 3.25 and 9.25 ppm I2 was statistically (p<0.05) similar to control group (T1). Further, it was noticed that feeding cost (Rs. per dozen or per kg eggs) was significantly increased due to the inclusion of higher level of iodine (13.0 ppm).
Conclusion:
It was concluded that supplementing iodine at 6.50 ppm in layers diet was economically better for the production of iodine enriched eggs followed by feed iodine supplementation at 3.25 ppm as compared to control and other treatment groups.
Keywords: eggs, iodine, layers, performance
Introduction
Egg is considered as a complete food with the most of the nutrients required for well-being. In addition to the nutrients already available in the egg if we can alter or incorporate certain health beneficiary nutrients then these eggs will be the choice of food for health conscious people and can reduce the chances of occurrence of certain diseases. Enriched egg with trace minerals results in eggs with superior biological and nutritional value for human consumption [1]. Surveys carried out by Indian Council of Medical Research have shown that no state or union territory is free from the problem of iodine deficiency disorders (IDDs). Out of 586 districts in the country, 281 districts have been surveyed for IDD and 41 districts have been found to be endemic [2], therefore, an improvement of iodine supply is still a great challenge for nutritionists.
Iodine (I2) is an essential micronutrient for humans and animals and its deficiency reduces the production of thyroid hormones, leads to the morphological and functional changes of the thyroid gland [3]. Fortification of various nutrients in egg is solely dependent on nutritional manipulation of the laying hen’s ration [4]; therefore, iodine enrichment can be achieved by dietary manipulation of hen’s diet. McDowell [5] pointed to a preferential interception of iodine in the hen ovary and an easy passage of iodine to oocytes. Experimental knowledge of factors participating in the relatively easy iodine passage to yolk makes it possible to increase iodine content in eggs.
The significance of this study is that the iodine supplementation in layer diets could increase the levels of iodine in hen eggs and can lead to prevention of iodine deficiency in humans.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementation of iodine at different levels in layers diet on egg iodine content and economics of feeding.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
The experiment on animals including all procedures of this study was approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.
Stock, diet and husbandry
In the experiment, 135 laying hens (White Leghorn) of 55 weeks age were randomly distributed to 5 dietary treatments; each group contained 27 laying hens distributed in three replicates of 9 birds each. T1 was basal layer diet without iodine enrichment (control), in which iodine (I2) content was as per NRC [6] recommendation (0.45 ppm). Basal diets were supplemented with calcium iodate (Ca (IO3)2) at 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/kg in T2, T3, T4 and T5 groups, respectively. Therefore, dietary iodine (I2) content in diets T2, T3, T4 and T5 was 3.25, 6.50, 9.75 and 13.00 ppm, respectively. All the diets were formulated as per NRC [6] recommendation using feed ingredients such as maize, soybean meal, and de-oiled rice polish. Ingredients and nutrient composition of all the diets are presented in Table-1. The experiment was for 10 weeks.
Table-1.
Ingredients and nutrient composition of layer diets (%).
Ingredients | Diets | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
Maize (kg) | 53.00 | 53.00 | 53.00 | 53.00 | 53.00 |
DORP (kg) | 16.80 | 16.80 | 16.80 | 16.80 | 16.80 |
SBM (kg) | 19.00 | 19.00 | 19.00 | 19.00 | 19.00 |
DCP (kg) | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.400 |
LSP (kg) | 03.00 | 03.00 | 03.00 | 03.00 | 03.00 |
Shell grit (kg) | 07.00 | 07.00 | 07.00 | 07.00 | 07.00 |
Salt (kg) | 0.360 | 0.360 | 0.360 | 0.360 | 0.360 |
MnSO4 (kg) | 0.054 | 0.054 | 0.054 | 0.054 | 0.054 |
ZnSO4 (kg) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
CuSO4 (kg) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
FeSO4 (kg) | 0.139 | 0.139 | 0.139 | 0.139 | 0.139 |
Ca (IO3)2 (kg) | 0.004 | 0.032 | 0.065 | 0.097 | 0.13 |
Vitamin A, B2, D3, K (kg)* | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 |
Vitamin B complex (kg)* | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Salinomycin (kg) | 0.044 | 0.044 | 0.044 | 0.044 | 0.044 |
Total (kg) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Nutrient composition analyzed | |||||
CP (%) | 16.15 | 16.32 | 16.20 | 16.29 | 16.27 |
Ca (%) | 03.47 | 03.56 | 03.38 | 03.65 | 03.73 |
Iodine (mg/kg) | 0.45 | 03.25 | 06.50 | 09.75 | 13.00 |
Nutrient composition calculated |
|||||
ME (kcal/kg) | 2602 | 2602 | 2602 | 2602 | 2602 |
Lysine (%) | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
Metdionine (%) | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
Vitamin premix provided (each 250 g contains): Vitamin A – 10,000,000 IU; Vitamin D3 – 2,000,000 IU; Vitamin B1 – 800 mg; Vitamin B2 – 5 g; Vitamin B6 - 1.6 g; Vitamin B12- 20.5 g; Niacin 12.0 g; Calcium D pantdotdenate - 8.0 g; Vitamin K3 - 1.0 g; Vitamin E - 8.0 g; Folic acid – 800 mg, DCP=Digestible crude protein, LSP=Left sacrum posterior, SBM=Soybean meal, DORP=Deoiled rice polish
All the laying hens were shifted to experimental layer house. The system of rearing was cage system. The house was cleaned, white washed, fumigated, and sprayed with disinfectant before introducing the birds in it and was provided with a sufficient light source. Layer mash was offered ad-libitum to the hens in feeders. Care was taken that feeders are full of feed at all time and constant watch was kept to avoid feed wastage. An ample supply of clean and fresh drinking water was made available to the laying hens all the time through simple water channel type waterer. During the experiment, the eggs were collected thrice daily, i.e., at 9.00 am; 12.00 noon and at 3.00 pm replicate wise and where weighed at 4.00 pm daily.
Parameters studied
Total 60 eggs (12 eggs from each treatment) were collected randomly at the end of 5th and 10th week of the experiment for iodine estimation. The iodine concentration in the egg yolk and albumin was determined by a spectrophotometer method (440 nm) using alkaline ashing based on the Sandell-Kolthoff reaction [7]. The principle of the assessment was the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ in the presence of As3+ and the catalytic effect of iodine. Mineralization took place in an alkaline medium at 600°C. In this method, organic sample fades away as the result of a high temperature and iodine released from the organic compound attaches to alcoholic group. The resulting product was not soluble in acid and thus the iodine content was determined chromatographically. In this method, iodine catalyzes a reductive oxidation reaction. In the same manner the iodine content was also measured after boiling the eggs.
All the experimental diets were analyzed for proximate compositions as per AOAC [8]. The economics of feeding was calculated as the cost of feed consumed in rupees for production of one dozen eggs as well as for one kg egg mass.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained during the experiment were analyzed statistically using the methods described by Snedecor and Cochran [9]. Differences between the treatments were tested for significance by Duncan’s new multiple range test using statistical software SPSS.
Results
Effects of dietary iodine on iodine composition of egg
The concentration of iodine in egg yolk and albumen (before and after boiling) of laying hens fed on various levels of iodine after 5th week of supplementation is presented in Table-2. The treatment means of the iodine concentration in eggs (before boiling) of laying hens fed on various levels of iodine after 5th week of supplementation indicated that the inclusion of different levels of iodine significantly (p<0.05) increased iodine content of egg yolk as well as albumen. Maximum and significantly (p<0.05) higher iodine content in egg yolk (1.17±0.025 µg/g) and egg albumin (0.12±0.001 µg/g) were recorded in layers assigned T5 (13 ppm I2) diet. Iodine content in egg yolk and albumen linearly decreased in layers assigned T4 (9.7 ppm I2), T3 (6.50 ppm I2), and T2 (3.25 ppm I2) diets, respectively. Minimum and significantly (p<0.05) lowest concentration of iodine content in egg yolk (0.19±0.005 µg/g) and egg albumin (0.02±0.002 µg/g) was found in layers assigned T1 (control) diet. The treatment means of the iodine concentration in eggs (after boiling) indicated that the use of higher levels of iodine significantly (p<0.05) increased iodine content of egg yolk as well as albumen. Maximum and significantly (p<0.05) higher iodine content of egg (after boiling) was noted in layers assigned T5 (13 ppm I2) diet. Iodine content in boiled egg yolk and albumen linearly decreased in layers assigned T4 (9.75 ppm I2), T3 (6.50 ppm I2) and T2 (3.25 ppm I2) diets, respectively. It was observed that about 10-15% iodine was lost after boiling the eggs.
Table-2.
Concentration of iodine in eggs of laying hens fed on various levels of iodine after 5th week of supplementation (before and after boiling).
Treatments | Iodine level (ppm) | Yolk iodine (µg/g) | Albumen iodine (µg/g) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before boiling | After boiling | Before boiling | After boiling | ||
T1 | 0.45 | 0.19e±0.005 | 0.17d±0.014 | 0.02d±0.002 | 0.02c±0.002 |
T2 | 03.25 | 0.27d±0.005 | 0.20d±0.014 | 0.04c±0.001 | 0.03c±0.001 |
T3 | 06.50 | 0.52c±0.029 | 0.44c±0.015 | 0.07b±0.002 | 0.06b±0.002 |
T4 | 09.75 | 0.81b±0.008 | 0.71b±0.018 | 0.08b±0.003 | 0.07b±0.001 |
T5 | 13.00 | 1.17a±0.025 | 1.03a±0.012 | 0.12a±0.001 | 0.11a±0.002 |
Mean values bearing different superscript differ significantly (p<0.05)
Iodine concentration in egg yolk and albumen (before and after boiling) of laying hens fed various levels of iodine after 10th week of supplementation (before and after boiling) is presented in the Table-3. The trend for iodine content in egg yolk and albumen was similar in the case of both boiled and unboiled eggs. The iodine content of eggs was significantly influenced due to the inclusion of different levels of iodine above recommended levels in the diet of laying hens. Among iodine supplemented groups, maximum and significantly (p<0.05) higher iodine content of egg yolk and albumen was recorded in hens assigned T5 (13 ppm I2) diet. Iodine content in egg yolk and albumen linearly decreased in layers assigned T4, T3 and T2 (9.75, 6.50 and 3.25 ppm I2) diets, respectively. Significantly (p<0.05) lowest iodine concentration in egg yolk and albumin was found in layers assigned T1 (control) diet. The treatment means of the iodine concentration indicated that, use of higher levels of iodine significantly (p<0.05) increased iodine content of egg yolk as well as albumen. Further, it was observed that about 10-15% iodine is lost on boiling the eggs.
Table-3.
Concentration of iodine in eggs of laying hens fed on various levels of iodine after 10th week of supplementation (before and after boiling).
Treatments | Iodine level (ppm) | Yolk iodine (µg/g) | Albumen iodine (µg/g) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before boiling | After boiling | Before boiling | After boiling | ||
T1 | 0.45 | 0.20e±0.014 | 0.18e±0.017 | 0.02e±0.001 | 0.02e±0.001 |
T2 | 03.25 | 0.28d±0.014 | 0.23d±0.020 | 0.05d±0.001 | 0.04d±0.002 |
T3 | 06.50 | 0.60c±0.014 | 0.51c±0.014 | 0.07c±0.001 | 0.06c±0.002 |
T4 | 09.75 | 0.84b±0.023 | 0.72b±0.020 | 0.09b±0.002 | 0.08b±0.002 |
T5 | 13.00 | 1.20a±0.021 | 1.03a±0.002 | 0.12a±0.002 | 0.11a±0.002 |
Mean values bearing different superscript differ significantly (p<0.05)
Effect of iodine supplementation on economics of feeding
The economics of feeding for the production of iodine enriched eggs is presented in Table-4. The results of this study revealed that among iodine supplemented diets, significantly (p<0.05) lowest feeding cost (Rs. per dozen or per kg egg mass) was noticed in layers receiving 6.50 ppm iodine in their diet. However, feeding cost (Rs. per dozen or per kg egg mass) of layers receiving 3.25 and 9.75 ppm iodine in their diet was statistically similar (p>0.05) and comparable to control (0.45 ppm I2). Further, inclusion of higher levels of iodine significantly (p<0.05) increased the feeding cost (Rs. per dozen or per kg eggs) in layers. Feed cost (Rs. per kg) was near about similar in all treatments since the price of iodine source was very low.
Table-4.
Economics of feeding for production of iodine enriched eggs.
Treatments | Iodine level (ppm) | Feed cost kg feed/dozen eggs (Rs.) | Feed cost kg feed/kg eggs (Rs.) |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.45 | 32.56b±0.167 | 46.22b±0.763 |
T2 | 03.25 | 32.43b±0.167 | 46.31b±0.480 |
T3 | 06.50 | 32.06c±0.063 | 45.58c±0.184 |
T4 | 09.75 | 32.81b±0.418 | 46.80b±0.663 |
T5 | 13.00 | 34.07a±0.126 | 50.47a±0.223 |
Mean values bearing different superscript differ significantly (p<0.05)
Discussion
Iodine content in eggs yolk and albumen, both after 5th week and 10th week of supplementation, linearly increased with the increasing iodine levels (0.45, 3.25, 6.50 and 13.0 ppm I2) in their diets. This increment may be due to the higher iodine transfer from feed to egg. The results of iodine concentration are consistent with the findings of Kaufmann et al. [10], who found a significant linear correlation (r=0.93) between iodine content in feed mixture up to 5 mg/kg and iodine content in yolk. Yang et al. [11] indicated that laying hens might be a good carrier for transporting iodine, from diet to egg. Ramune et al. [12] found that in eggs from laying hens receiving feed containing 1 and 4 ppm iodine, egg iodine content was 24% and 196 % more than control group. Moreover, Songserm et al. [13] revealed that 4000 mg supplemental iodine/ton diet in two forms potassium iodide or potassium iodate increased the iodine concentration of eggs. In support to the results of this study introduction of iodine supplement from 1 to 5 mg/kg into the diet of hens enabled the significant enrichment of the egg iodine content [14]. Saki et al. [15] indicated that increased albumen and yolk iodine is proportional to level of supplementary iodine in diet (p<0.05). Similarly, Gjorgovska and Kiril [16] stated that when laying hen feed enriched with 5 mg iodine/kg diet, the yolk from eggs of such hens is better source of iodine and can fulfill 11-15% of daily requirements for adult people if they consume one egg per day. Travnicek et al. [17] found that when iodine content in feed mixtures was raised from 0.22 to 1.18 mg/kg dietary dry matter, iodine content in egg yolk was increased significantly. Malak et al. [18] in their experiment also observed that increasing iodine levels from 0.3 to 9.6 ppm in hens diet significantly increased egg iodine concentration and the highest concentration of egg iodine was observed for the hens fed diet supplemented with 9.6 ppm followed by those fed 4.8 ppm iodine, while these high levels of iodine negatively affected the egg production. They concluded that supplementation of laying hen diet with 2.4 mg iodine/kg diet gave iodine enriched egg which can fulfill 44% of daily requirements of iodine for children of 1-10 years. The results of this study regarding egg iodine concentration are also in concurrent with the findings of Rottger et al. [19] who recorded linear correlation between iodine content in feed and egg yolk.
In this study, the reduction in the iodine content of eggs after boiling ranged between 10% and 15%. In concurrent to this lower iodine recovery in the case of egg boiled for 30 min was also reported by Lipiec et al. [20]. While, Songserm et al. [13] studied iodine stabilization of iodine-enriched eggs before boiling followed by two methods of boiling, i.e. short time (soft boiled egg) and long time (hardboiled egg) and reported no any significant (p>0.05) difference in the iodine levels of boiled and unboiled eggs.
Among iodine supplemented diets, minimum and significantly (p<0.05) lowest feeding cost (Rs per dozen or per kg egg mass) was noticed in layers receiving 6.50 mg/kg iodine in their diet. Further, the inclusion of higher levels of iodine significantly (p<0.05) increased the feeding cost in layers. In support to our results, Malak et al. [18] also reported improved economic efficiency of laying hens fed 0.6, 1.2, 2.4 and 4.8 ppm iodine in their diet as compared to control.
Conclusion
From the results of the present experiment, it was concluded that iodine at 6.50 ppm in layers diet was economically better for the production of iodine enriched eggs followed by feed iodine supplementation at 3.25 ppm as compared to control and other treatment groups.
Authors’ Contributions
SN and RPSB have designed the plan of work. SS carried out the laboratory work and analyzed the results. AN and CDM drafted and RK revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to The Dean, Collage of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jabalpur for providing support and necessary laboratory facilities to carry out this research.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Al-Massad M, Al-Shdefat R, Khashroum A. The effects of microbial phytase and dietary calcium level on the performance and eggshell quality in laying hens fed marginal phosphorus diets. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2011;5:118–126. [Google Scholar]
- 2.ACC/SCN. Fifth Report on the World Nutrition Situation:Nutrition for Improved Development Outcomes. Geneva: ACC/SCN; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Krzepiłko A, Zych-Wężyk I, Molas J. Alternative ways of enriching the human diet with iodine. J. Pre-Clin. Clin. Res. 2015;9(2):167–171. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nimalaratne C, Wu J. Hen egg as an antioxidant food commodity:A review. Nutrients. 2015;7:8274–8293. doi: 10.3390/nu7105394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McDowell L.R. Minerals in Animal and Human Nutrition. USA: Academic Press Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1992. p. 524. [Google Scholar]
- 6.NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. USA: National Academy of Sciences; 1994. pp. 19–34. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Trokhimenko O.M, Zaitsev V.N. Kinetic determination of iodide by the sandell-kolthoff reaction using diphenylamine-4-sulfonic acid. J. Anal. Chem. 2004;59:491–494. [Google Scholar]
- 8.AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Snedecor G.W, Cochran W.G. Statistical Methods. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa, USA: The Iowa State University Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaufmann S, Wolfram G, Delange F, Rambeck W.A. Iodine supplementation of laying hen feed:A supplementary measure to eliminate iodine deficiency in humans. Z. Ernahrungswiss. 1998;37(3):288–293. doi: 10.1007/pl00007378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang L.I.E, Coa S, Cheng M, Chen L, Chen K. Effects of iron, zinc, iodine and selenium levels in rations on activities of metabolic enzymes of layers and egg quality. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. China. 2004;51:352–413. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramune C, Bobiniene R, Vytautassirvydis D, Gudaviciute M, Inga K. Effect of stable iodine preparation on the quality of poultry products. Vet. Zootech-Lith. 2008;42(64):1392–2130. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Songserm O, Chewprecha W, Sinawat S, Chotvichien S, Suakam P. Iodine supplementation in layer diets for commercial production of iodine-enriched eggs. The Proceedings of 44th Kasetsart University Annual Conference Animals, Veterinary Medicine. 2006:257–264. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Słupczynska M, Jamroz D, Orda J, Wiliczkiewicz A. Effect of various sources and levels of iodine, as well as the kind of diet, on the performance of young laying hens, iodine accumulation in eggs, egg characteristics, and morphotic and biochemical indices in blood. Poult. Sci. 2014;93(10):2536–2547. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-03959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saki A.A, Farisar M.A, Aliarabi H, Zamani P, Abbasinezhad M. Iodine enriched egg production in response to dietary iodine in laying hens. J. Agric. Technol. 2012;8(4):1255–1267. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gjorgovska N, Kiril F. Enriching table eggs with iodine. Lucrări Ştiinţifice. 2010;53(15):332–335. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Travnicek J, Korupova V, Herzig I, Kursa J. Iodine content in consumer hen eggs. Vet. Med. 2006;51:93–100. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Malak N.Y.A, Osman S.M.H, Bahakaim A.S.A, Omar A.S, Ramadan N.A. Effect of using different levels of iodine in layer’s diets on egg iodine enrichment. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 2012;32:851–864. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rottger A.S, Halle I, Wagner H, Breves G, Danicke S, Flachowsky G. The effects of iodine level and source on iodine carry-over in eggs and body tissues of laying hens. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2012;66(5):385–401. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2012.719795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lipiec E, Warowicka O, Ruzik L, Zhou Y, Jarosz M, Połec-Pawlak K. Investigation of iodine bioavailability from chicken eggs versus iodized kitchen salt with in vitro method. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012;234:913–919. [Google Scholar]