Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;18(6):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5595

Table 6.

Proportions of nonsmoking youth (unadjusted) susceptible to smoking, and results from logistic regression analyses predicting smoking susceptibility (results from landline sample).

Characteristic 12- to 17-year-olds (n=3377) 18- to 24-year-olds (n=1594)
%a ORb,c 95% CI P %a ORb 95% CI P
Exposure










Never/rarely 23 (reff)


13 (ref)



Exposedd to online adsg and branding 29 1.32 1.11 1.57 .002 16 1.30 0.92 1.83 .137

Exposedd to online branding only 30 1.39 1.10 1.77 .007 11 0.76 0.44 1.31 .315
Year










2010 24 1.00 0.79 1.25 .967 10 0.64 0.41 1.00 .049

2011 25 1.06 0.85 1.32 .610 13 0.80 0.53 1.22 .301

2012 29 1.22 0.98 1.52 .069 15 0.99 0.67 1.46 .955

2013 25 (ref)


15 (ref)


Sex










Female 23 (ref)


12 (ref)



Male 28 1.30 1.11 1.53 .001 15 1.43 1.05 1.93 .021
State










NSWc 25 (ref)


13 (ref)



QLDh 26 0.99 0.85 1.16 .931 14 1.11 0.82 1.51 .480
SESe,i










Low 24 (ref)


15 (ref)



Moderate-high 26 1.13 0.94 1.36 .187 13 0.88 0.63 1.23 .445
Friends who smoke N/Aj 1.23 1.13 1.34 <.001 N/A 1.04 0.93 1.16 .495
Household members who smoke N/A 1.16 1.05 1.29 .005 N/A 1.22 1.00 1.50 .050
Internet, hours N/A 1.05 1.01 1.09 .009 N/A 0.99 0.94 1.04 .697

aPercentages are weighted.

bOdds ratios are from weighted analyses.

cOR: odds ratio.

dExposure=sometimes or often exposed.

eBased on postal code.

fref: reference category.

gads: advertisements.

hQLD: Queensland.

iSES: socioeconomic status.

jN/A: not applicable.