Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50–58. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112

Table 3.

Patient ratings of physician communication*

Preferred role Actual role N (%) Adjusted % providing top rating OR (95% CI) P
All Patients* 4825 (100) 55.8%
Patient-controlled 1739 (36) 55.3% 0.93 (0.81–1.06) 0.27
Shared 2799 (58) 57.0% 1.0 Ref
Physician-controlled 287 (6) 47.5% 0.67 (0.51–0.87) 0.002
Patient-controlled 1914 (40) 57.4% 0.98 (0.86–1.11) 0.75
Shared 2264 (47) 57.9% 1.0 Ref
Physician-controlled 647 (13) 43.7% 0.55 (0.45–0.66) <0.001

Effect of Actual Role Stratified by Preferred Role

Patient-controlled
Patient-controlled 1067 (22) 57.0% 1.03 (0.83–1.29) 0.78
Shared 494 (10) 56.2% 1.0 Ref
Physician-controlled 178 (4) 44.8% 0.62 (0.43–0.89) 0.009

Shared control
Patient-controlled 785 (16) 58.5% 0.95 (0.80–1.14) 0.60
Shared 1674 (35) 59.6% 1.0 Ref
Physician-controlled 340 (7) 43.3% 0.50 (0.39–0.64) <0.001

Physician-controlled
Patient-controlled 62 (1) 50.9% 1.22 (0.58–2.57) 0.59
Shared 96 (2) 46.4% 1.0 Ref
Physician-controlled 129 (3) 35.6% 0.61 (0.33–1.13) 0.12
*

P for interaction of preferred and actual role=0.76, so only main effects model is presented in the top box; stratified results are also presented. These multivariable logistic regression models also adjusted for all variables in Table 1.