Table 6.
No ERT | ERT | |
---|---|---|
n=37 | n=21 | |
hs‐TNT*, ng/L | ||
Baseline | 4.0 (4.0–10.4) | 8.9 (4.8–30.1)† |
Follow‐up | 6.1 (4.0–18.9)‡ | 14.6 (6.9–48.0)†, ‡ |
LE‐positive myocardial volume, % | ||
Baseline | 0.2 (0–1.2) | 0.6 (0–1.8) |
Follow‐up | 1.0 (0–2.3)‡ | 2.3 (0.6–3.9)‡ |
IVSd, mm | ||
Baseline | 10.3±2.2 | 12.6±3.2† |
Follow‐up | 10.1±2.2 | 12.1±2.5† |
EF, % | ||
Baseline | 65±5 | 65±5 |
Follow‐up | 64±6 | 62±7 |
Using repeated‐measures ANOVA followed by Tukey's post‐hoc test. EF indicates ejection fraction; ERT, enzyme replacement therapy; hs‐TNT, high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T; IVSd, end‐diastolic interventricular septal wall thickness; LE, late enhancement.
*Ln‐transformed.
† P<0.05 vs no ERT.
‡ P<0.05 vs baseline.