Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003226. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003226

Table 9.

NRI and IDI for Final CTA Models Versus Model Including UKPDS and log CAC Score Alone

Total Cohort (N=630, 41 Events) Patients With Coronary Plaque (N=500, 41 Events)
Categorical NRI
Patients with events correctly reclassified to higher risk 11 22
Patients with events incorrectly reclassified to lower risk 5 2
Event net reclassification improvement 14.6% 48.8%
Patients without events correctly reclassified to lower risk 102 54
Patients without events incorrectly reclassified to higher risk 45 150
Nonevent net reclassification improvement 9.6% −20.9%
Overall net reclassification improvement 0.24 0.28
Continuous NRI
Patients with events correctly reclassified to higher risk 26 33
Patients with events incorrectly reclassified to lower risk 15 8
Event net reclassification improvement 26.8% 61.0%
Patients without events correctly reclassified to lower risk 402 249
Patients without events incorrectly reclassified to higher risk 187 210
Nonevent net reclassification improvement 36.5% 8.5%
Overall net reclassification improvement 0.632 0.70
Absolute IDI 0.037 0.025
Relative IDI 64.7% 30.3%

CAC indicates coronary artery calcium; CTA, computed tomography angiography; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study; NRI, net Reclassification Improvement; IDI, integrated Discrimination Improvement .