Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 21;44(12):5646–5657. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw176

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Dam4-HT-intein@L127C-PC DamID profiles in Drosophila tissues. (A) Comparison of PC DamID profiles in Kc cells, Drosophila larval central brain and fat bodies. A 2.0 Mb fragment of chromosomal arm 2L is shown. Data for Kc cells are from (10). (B and C) Comparison of conventional Dam-PC profile (26) and Dam4-HT-intein@L127C-PC DamID profile, both in larval central brain. (B) Genome-wide correlation between the data sets. r, Pearson's correlation coefficient; n, number of GATC fragments compared. (C) A 1.0 Mb fragment of chromosomal arm 2L is shown. The lower noise level and wider dynamic range of the Dam4-HT-intein@L127C-PC DamID profile might be due to different detection platform used (high-throughput sequencing instead of microarrays). In (A) and (C) a running mean algorithm (a sliding window of 10 GATC fragments, one GATC fragment per step) was applied to the PC binding data; genes are indicated by black rectangles.