Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Assessment. 2014 Nov 3;22(5):561–580. doi: 10.1177/1073191114556101

Table 9.

Regression models showing summed ICU total and subscale scores predicting primary caregiver- and teacher-reported age 9.5 and 10.5 externalizing behavior

Within informant

Primary caregiver reports age 9.5 Primary caregiver reports age 10.5

Aggressive Rule-breaking Aggressive Rule-breaking
3FBF Model 1 – total ICU score
Total ICU (n =22) (PC) .55*** .52*** .03 .08*

Model 2 – subscale scores
Callous subscale (PC) .43*** .44*** .02 .03
Uncaring subscale (PC) .32*** .26*** .03 .08
Unemotional subscale (PC) −.11*** −.07 −.001 −.02

2F Model 3 – total revised ICU score
Total ICU (n =12) (PC) .59*** .56*** .03 .10*

Model 4– total revised subscale scores
Callous subscale (PC) .43*** .43*** .003 .03
Uncaring subscale (PC) .27*** .23*** .03 .08
Across informant

Teacher reports age 9.5 Teacher reports age 10.5

Aggressive Rule-breaking Aggressive Rule-breaking
3FBF Model 5 – total ICU score
Total ICU (n =22) (PC) .15** .13** .08 .16**

Model 6 – subscale scores
Callous subscale (PC) .10 .04 −.01 .06
Uncaring subscale (PC) .09 .11 .11 .10
Unemotional subscale (PC) −.01 .02 −.03 −.01

2F Model 7 – total revised ICU score
Total ICU (n =12) (PC) .17*** .15** .09 .17**

Model 8– total revised subscale scores
Callous subscale (PC) .16** .08 .01 .07
Uncaring subscale (PC) .06 .09 .12* .14*

Note.

p < .10;

*

p <.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001.

Ext =Externalizing; Agg =Aggression; RuleB =Rule-breaking; PC = primary caregiver-reported; T =teacher-reported. All models controlled for intervention group, gender, race, ethnicity, and project site. Models predicting age 10.5 outcomes controlled for age 9.5 primary caregiver-reported aggressive or rule-breaking behavior as relevant. Controlling for concurrent internalizing disorder did not change the pattern of findings – results are not shown for brevity.