Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;354:i3570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3570

Table 3.

Use of radiologic imaging after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and thoracoscopic resection during follow-up. Figures are median (interquartile range) numbers of scans

Full cohort Matched cohort
SABR Surgery P value SABR Surgery  P value
SABR v thoracoscopic SLR tumor size ≤2 cm
PET/PET-CT in first year 1 (0-3) 0 (0-0) <0.001 2 (0-3) 0 (0-0) <0.001
PET/PET-CT in first 2 years 2 (0-4) 0 (0-0) <0.001 2 (0-4) 0 (0-2) <0.001
CT in first year 4 (2-6) 2 (1-4) <0.001 4 (2-6) 2 (0-4) <0.001
CT in first 2 years 5 (2-9) 4 (2-8) 0.004 6 (2-10) 4 (2-6) <0.001
SABR v thoracoscopic resection tumor size ≤5 cm
PET/PET-CT in first year 1 (0-3) 0 (0-0) <0.001 2 (0-3) 0 (0-0) <0.001
PET/PET-CT in first 2 years 2 (0-4) 0 (0-1) <0.001 2 (0-4) 0 (0-1) <0.001
CT in first year 3 (2-6) 2 (1-4) <0.001 3 (2-6) 2 (1-4) <0.001
CT in first 2 years 5 (2-9) 4 (2-7) 0.02 5 (2-9) 4 (2-6) <0.001

PET=positron emission tomography; CT=computed tomography; SLR=thoracic sublobar lung resection.