Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;124(7):1062–1070. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1510513

Table 3.

ANOVA for adult activity of 166 DGRP lines [degrees of freedom (DF); Type III mean squares (MS)]

Analysis Reduced analyses Source DF MS Error DF F-Value p-Value Variance component
Full model Treatment 1 739980.1 170.1 0.75 0.3881 Fixed
Sex 1 275320.6 167.7 0.15 0.6989 Fixed
Treatment × sex 1 253499.5 173.6 0.43 0.5144 Fixed
Line 165 20507687.5 176.0 8.76 < 0.0001 121983.4
Sex × line 165 1923507.8 165 3.14 < 0.0001 18092.6
Treatment × line 165 1029336.1 165 1.68 0.0005 5230.5
Treatment × sex × line 165 612337.5 25,600 2.24 < 0.0001 9218.6
Residual 25,600 273954.7 170.1 273941.6
By treatment Control Sex 1 603134.9 167.31 0.43 0.5121 Fixed
Line 165 11822085.7 165 8.18 < 0.0001 121949.8
Sex × line 165 1445867.5 13,764 5.98 < 0.0001 27771.5
Residual 13,764 241671.0 241654.6
Lead Sex 1 200.4 176.4 0.00 0.9894 Fixed
Line 165 10688962.1 165 8.64 < 0.0001 132659.8
Sex × line 165 1236961.0 11,836 3.97 < 0.0001 26293.8
Residual 11,836 311497.2 167.3 311485.3
By treatment and sex Control female Line 165 6368290.1 6,874 27.93 < 0.0001 141348.8
Residual 6,874 228037.9 228030.5
Control male Line 165 6941945.0 6,890 27.19 < 0.0001 157929.9
Residual 6,890 255272.5 255270.7
Lead female Line 165 5769243.4 5,884 25.72 < 0.0001 146230.3
Residual 5,884 224273.1 224276.7
Lead male Line 165 6668344.8 5,952 16.77 < 0.0001 168890.3
Residual 5,952 397724.8 6,874 397735.5
Twenty-four lines were excluded from this analysis because of low yield of adult flies. h2 = (σ2L + σ2× S + σ2× T + σ2× T × S)/(σ2L + σ2× S + σ2× T + σ2× T × S + ε) = 0.36.