Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158135

Table 2. Internalization of silica nanospheres by bacterial and yeast cells after EMF exposures.

Silica nanospheres
23.5 nm 46.3 nm
Bacterial strains Loading capacity * Amount of cells took up nanospheres(%) Loading capacity * Amount of cells took up nanospheres (%)
Branhamella catarrhalis ATCC 23246* 183 ± 8 98 ± 4 Not detected Not applicable
Kocuria rosea CIP 71.15T* 139 ± 8 99 ± 5 62 ± 8 83 ± 8
Planococcus maritimus KMM 3738 172 ± 8 97 ± 5 75 ± 8 80 ± 9
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 161 ± 8 99 ± 4 81 ± 8 40 ± 7
Staphylococcus aureus CIP 65.8T 261 ± 8 99 ± 3 114 ± 8 44 ± 7
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990T 211 ± 8 99 ± 5 Not detected Not applicable
Streptomyces griseus ATCC 23915* 200 ± 8 99 ± 5 109 ± 8 55 ± 8
Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 287* 27778 ± 8 97 ± 5 Not detected Not applicable

* per single cell

Nanosphere loading capacity was calculated using the fluorescence intensity of nanospheres. The number of bacterial and yeast cells that were able to internalize the nanospheres, expressed as a percentage, was calculated by counting fluorescent cells in the CLSM images. Data are means ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments.