Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158496

Table 4. Model selection for all tested GEE models under both Brownian and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck modes of evolution using the complete dataset collected here (models from Table 2).

Model Brownian Evolution QIC O-U Evolution QIC
i) BM 186.365 37.459
ii) BM + CS 236.149 40.446
iii) BM + HP + CS 200.492 37.920
iv) BM+ MP + FP + CS 239.241 44.073
v) BM + HP + FP + MP + CS 200.102 41.879
vi) BM + HT 453.644 53.225
vii) BM + CS + HT 458.322 58.564
viii) BM + HP + CS + HT 468.529 60.486
ix) BM+ MP + FP + CS + HT 459.464 62.541
x) BM + HP + FP + MP + CS + HT 469.980 64.437
xi) BM + ME 188.630 37.866
xii) BM + CS + ME 242.280 41.656
xiii) BM + HP + CS + ME 215.036 39.304
xiv) BM+ MP + FP + CS + ME 245.455 45.204
xv) BM + HP + FP + MP + CS + ME 214.440 43.272

The model with the lowest QIC value (bold) represents the best balance of explanatory power and model complexity available from the suite of tested models. Models within 4 QIC of the best model (bold italics) still contain some explanatory power.