Table 1. Model selection for factors affecting bee abundance in highbush blueberry fields of British Columbia (BC) and Michigan (MI).

Only suboptimal models with ΔAIC_c ≤ 3 are shown.

Response	Region	Explanatory variables	df	logLik	AICc	delta	Model weight
Wild bees	BC	Honey bees + Land use (2000 m) + Row orientation	9	-207.07	431.27	0	0.32
		Land use (2000 m) + Row orientation	7	-208.31	431.49	0.21	0.29
		Honey bees + Land use (2000 m)	7	-208.34	431.55	0.27	0.28
	MI	Distance from edge + Honey bees + Land use (300 m) + Row orientation	11	-226.74	476.88	0	0.52
		Distance from edge + Honey bees + Land use (300 m) + Row orientation + Orientation/distance interaction	14	-224.08	478.41	1.54	0.24
		Distance from edge + Land use (300 m) + Row orientation	10	-229.07	479.31	2.43	0.16
Honey bees	BC	Land use (300 m) + Row orientation	7	-345.20	705.27	0	0.40
		Land use (300 m)	6	-346.66	705.97	0.70	0.28
		Stocking rate + land use (300 m) + Row orientation	8	-345.18	707.49	2.22	0.13
		Stocking rate + land use (300 m)	7	-346.58	708.03	2.76	0.10
	MI	Land use (1000 m)	6	-717.93	1448.30	0	0.28
		Land use (1000 m) + Row orientation	7	-717.38	1449.34	1.04	0.17
		(null)	5	-719.74	1449.79	1.49	0.13
		Stocking rate + land use (1000 m)	7	-717.92	1450.42	2.12	0.11
		Row orientation	6	-719.16	1450.75	2.45	0.08