Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158382

Table 3. Five statements for which there was high agreement concerning whether they should be classified as “facts” and high levels of endorsement as a function of ideological group.

Item Ideological Group Percentage of Group Rate as Fact Percentage of Group Endorse
Liberals 71.52% 94.94%
“Delaying or refusing vaccinations leaves children unprotected against many dangerous diseases.” Moderates 68.25% 90.48%
Conservatives 61.45% 87.95%
Total 68.12% 91.38%
Liberals 70.25% 93.67%
“Vaccinations against dangerous diseases have saved more lives than drugs in the late 20th century, such as the development and use of antibiotics.” Moderates 61.11% 93.65%
Conservatives 60.24% 83.13%
Total 64.85% 91.28%
Liberals 67.72% 94.30%
“Vaccinations are necessary for eliminating vaccine-preventable diseases.” Moderates 59.52% 93.65%
Conservatives 55.42% 85.54%
Total 62.13% 92.10%
Liberals 81.65% 95.57%
“The creation of vaccinations consists of a long process in order to determine whether or not it is safe and effective for public use.” Moderates 64.29% 92.06%
Conservatives 63.86% 84.34%
Total 71.66% 91.83%
Liberals 7.59% 10.76%
“The increased number of vaccinations prior to a child’s second birthday is the reason why there has been an increase in Autism Spectrum Disorder in children.” Moderates 4.76% 21.34%
Conservatives 6.02% 19.28%
Total 6.27% 16.35%