There is an error in the “length of longitudinal periods” section of Table 1 in the third column. The correct value is “5yrs.” Please see the corrected Table 1 here.
Table 1. Algorithm for enrollment of COPD cases and contributing to COPD prevalence, according to prevalence periods and length of longitudinal periods.
prevalence periods | |||
---|---|---|---|
2002–2006 | 2004–2006 | 2004–2006 | |
length of longitudinal periods | |||
3yrs | 3yrs | 5yrs | |
Definition of cases | 2000–2006 | 2002–2006 | 2000–2006 |
Subjects with one of the HDR ICD9 codes (490, 491, 492, 494, 496) as principal or secondary diagnosis and still alive at the beginning of the prevalence period | 2182 | 1654 | 1897 |
+ | |||
Subjects with COPD diagnosis in hospital chart, still alive at the beginning of the period, with no HDR report in the longitudinal period | 17 | 12 | 13 |
+ | |||
Subjects with COPD diagnosis in outpatient clinic chart, still alive and with no HDR report or hospital chart in the longitudinal period | 33 | 35 | 33 |
+ | |||
Subjects with spirometry and FEV1/FVC< = 0.70, with no HDR report or clinical charts in the longitudinal period | 250 | 246 | 247 |
+ | |||
Subjects deceased with COPD as underlined cause in the prevalence period, with no HDR report or clinical charts or spirometry in the longitudinal period | 62 | 38 | 33 |
= | |||
COPD prevalent cases enrolled in each period | 2544 | 1985 | 2223 |
Reference
- 1.Romanelli AM, Raciti M, Protti MA, Prediletto R, Fornai E, Faustini A (2016) How Reliable Are Current Data for Assessing the Actual Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? PLoS ONE 11(2): e0149302 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]