Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158458

Table 3. Diameter’s gradient according to clinical management strategy (for Chest radiograph and CT) and lung cancer diagnosis after 18 months of follow-up*.

VARIABLES Chest radiograph CT
N (%)
(95% CI)
Total 480 (100%) (40; 8.3%) No further testing 95 (19.8%) (0) Follow-up 84 (17.5%) (4; 4.8%) Immediate interventions 301 (62.7%) (36; 11.9%) p-value Total 413 (100%) (51; 12.4%) No further testing 108 (26.2%) (0) Follow-up 196 (47.5%) (11; 5.6%) Immediate interventions 109 (26.4%) (40; 36.7%) p-value
Diameter <0.001 <0.001
 3–4 mm 34 10 (29.4) 13 (38.2) 11 (32.4) 47 14 (29.8) 25 (53.2) 8 (17.0)
 >4–6 74 19 (25.7) 23 (31.1) (1; 4.3) 32 (43.2) (1; 2.5) 99 39 (39.4) 45 (45.5) (2, 4.4) 15 (15.2) (3, 20.0)
 >6–8 60 16 (26.7) 21 (35.0) 23 (38.3) 66 16 (24.2) 38 (57.6) (3, 7.9) 12 (18.2)
 >8 287 44 (14.1) 25 (8.0) (8; 32) 218 (69.9) (28; 12.8) 188 33 (17.6) 85 (45.2) (31, 36.5) 70 (37.2) (11, 15.7)
 Not specified 25 6 (24.0) 2 (8.0) 17 (68.0) (2; 11.8) 13 6 (46.2) 3 (23.1) 4 (30.8) (1, 25.0)

(*) Lung cancer cases are shown in bold for each category together with the risk as a percentage.