Skip to main content
. 2016 May 11;6(7):2103–2111. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.030452

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Performance analysis of sRNA-seq alignment methods. (A) Precisions, sensitivities, and F1 scores for alignments of simulated sRNA-seq data with the indicated methods for entire datasets. Boxplots show medians (central bars), the 1st to 3rd quartile range (boxes), other data out to 1.5 the interquartile range (whiskers), and outliers (dots); n = 15, 12, and 21 for the At, Os, and Zm data, respectively. Treatments sharing a common letter indicate groups that are not significantly different by nonparametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunn multiple comparison test, α = 0.05). (B) MMAP reads only. Same analysis and conventions as in (A). (C) False negative rates for alignments of real sRNA-seq data with the indicated methods for MMAP reads. Plotting conventions as in (A). At, A. thaliana; Os, O. sativa; Zm, Z. mays.