Table 5. Tests for redundancy between UBR-5 and SEL-10.
Genotype | Avg No. Embryos Produced (± SE) | N | % Viable Progeny | n |
---|---|---|---|---|
ubr-5(om2); unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts); sel-10(ok1632) | 124 ± 5 | 10 | 74.8 | 1243 |
ubr-5(om2); unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts) | 174 ± 10 | 10 | 40.0 | 1740 |
unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts); sel-10(ok1632)a | 119 ± 15 | 12 | 0.6 | 1428 |
unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts)b | 129 ± 8 | 16 | 0.0 | 2065 |
ubr-5(om2); sel-10(ok1632)a | 248 ± 6 | 12 | 97.2 | 2972 |
ubr-5(om2) | 276 ± 17 | 7 | 98.4 | 1901 |
sel-10(ok1632) original RB1432a,c | 157 ± 17 | 8 | 32.0 | 1441 |
sel-10(ok1632) reisolated from ubr-5(om2); sel-10(ok1632)c | 225 ± 7 | 5 | 98.6 | 1125 |
Assays were conducted at 20°. N, number of full broods counted; n, number of individuals counted.
The reported broods were produced by animals with a functional vulva. Some animals of these genotypes have a defective vulva and consequently fail to lay eggs and/or die prematurely, in each case producing a limited number of offspring that does not reflect the degree of germline proliferation. Hence, the effective brood size of this strain is smaller than the value listed here.
These data also are listed in Table 1.
The embryonic lethality and reduced brood size of strain RB1432 do not appear to be caused by sel-10(ok1632). See text.