Skip to main content
. 2016 May 13;6(7):2125–2134. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.027805

Table 5. Tests for redundancy between UBR-5 and SEL-10.

Genotype Avg No. Embryos Produced (± SE) N % Viable Progeny n
ubr-5(om2); unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts); sel-10(ok1632) 124 ± 5 10 74.8 1243
ubr-5(om2); unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts) 174 ± 10 10 40.0 1740
unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts); sel-10(ok1632)a 119 ± 15 12 0.6 1428
unc-32(e189) glp-1(q231ts)b 129 ± 8 16 0.0 2065
ubr-5(om2); sel-10(ok1632)a 248 ± 6 12 97.2 2972
ubr-5(om2) 276 ± 17 7 98.4 1901
sel-10(ok1632) original RB1432a,c 157 ± 17 8 32.0 1441
sel-10(ok1632) reisolated from ubr-5(om2); sel-10(ok1632)c 225 ± 7 5 98.6 1125

Assays were conducted at 20°. N, number of full broods counted; n, number of individuals counted.

a

The reported broods were produced by animals with a functional vulva. Some animals of these genotypes have a defective vulva and consequently fail to lay eggs and/or die prematurely, in each case producing a limited number of offspring that does not reflect the degree of germline proliferation. Hence, the effective brood size of this strain is smaller than the value listed here.

b

These data also are listed in Table 1.

c

The embryonic lethality and reduced brood size of strain RB1432 do not appear to be caused by sel-10(ok1632). See text.