Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Feb 11;35(7):1719–1728. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2527619

TABLE III.

Characteristics of the Selected Features in Table II and Analysis of Their Changes Over Three “Prior” Screening Cycles

Selected feature Prior #1 Mean (SD) Prior #2 Mean (SD) Prior #3 Mean (SD) P-value a P-value b P-value c

Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative
CW-SSIM (dense breast region) 0.410 (0.037) 0.425 (0.025) 0.408 (0.041) 0.423 (0.044) 0.407 (0.042) 0.427 (0.036) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Maximum short run low GL emphasis (whole breast) 3.06e−4 (4.17e−4) 1.86e−4 (1.71e−4) 2.77e−4 (3.63e−4) 1.99e−4 (2.50e−4) 2.87e−4 (3.98e−4) 3.09e−4 (5.31e−4) 0.001 0.02 0.67
CB-SSIM of WLD gradient orientation image (p = 24) 0.280 (0.073) 0.263 (0.066) 0.275 (0.072) 0.269 (0.080) 0.274 (0.072) 0.274 (0.070) 0.03 0.49 0.95
PD computed with max. intensity of segmented breast 1.25e−4 (2.91e−4) 8.46e−5 (2.86e−4) 1.17e−4 (2.35e−4) 8.34e−5 (1.83e−4) 2.29e−4 (7.72e−4) 5.62e−5 (1.51e−4) 0.20 0.14 <0.01
Standard deviation of directional gradient computed along x axis 222.5 (143.3) 201.4 (128.1) 230.6 (139.4) 194.4 (121.3) 217.6 (147.3) 191.7 (132.2) 0.16 0.01 0.09
Mean contrast (whole breast region) 26.4 (24.1) 22.8 (17.9) 24.1 (20.2) 27.9 (23.6) 29.0 (33.4) 27.1 (25.7) 0.12 0.12 0.55
a

P-value from t-test for positive versus negative cases in “prior” #1 images,

b

”prior” #2 images, and

c

”prior” #3 images.