Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 8;57(9):1066–1074. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12505

Table 2. Invariance of Parent-rated IN, HI, and SCT at Preschool, Post-1st, Post-4th, and Post-9th Grades.

Model tested df χ2 p Δdf Δχ2 p CFI TLI RMSEA [90% CI] MC ΔCFI ΔTLI Pass?
Null model 4950 36649.9 <.001
Measurement model estimates
1: Configural invariance; correlated errors across like items 4634 6191.7 <.001 .95 .95 .026 [.024, .028] Yes
2: Loading and threshold invariance (strong invariance) 4829 6440.7 <.001 .95 .95 .026 [.024, .028] 2 vs. 1 .002 .000 Yes
Latent model estimates
3: Latent factor correlation invariance 4838 6435.4 <.001 9 16.1 .064 .95 .95 .026 [.024, .028] 3 vs. 2 .001 .000 Yes

Note. IN=inattention; HI=hyperactivity/impulsivity; SCT=sluggish cognitive tempo; CFI=comparative fit index; TLI=Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA=root-mean-square error of approximation; CI=confidence interval; MC=model comparison; Pass=comparison meets invariance study criteria.