Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 8;57(9):1066–1074. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12505

Table 3. Latent Variance-Covariance Matrix and Latent Means from Strong Factorial Invariance Model.

Construct IN T1 HI T1 SCT T1 IN T2 HI T2 SCT T2 IN T3 HI T3 SCT T3 IN T4 HI T4 SCT T4
IN T1 .81 .78 .82 .64 .56 .63 .60 .55 .55 .59 .49 .57
HI T1 .62 .79 .62 .51 .73 .47 .48 .67 .40 .47 .63 .42
SCT T1 .61 .45 .68 .66 .53 .78 .54 .44 .62 .44 .33 .60
IN T2 .55 .43 .51 .90 .75 .92 .80 .61 .75 .63 .49 .65
HI T2 .52 .67 .45 .73 1.06 .68 .62 .84 .53 .44 .66 .43
SCT T2 .53 .39 .60 .81 .65 .87 .78 .56 .84 .61 .42 .74
IN T3 .56 .44 .46 .78 .66 .75 1.08 .76 .92 .75 .55 .72
HI T3 .53 .64 .38 .62 .92 .56 .84 1.15 .67 .51 .72 .43
SCT T3 .55 .40 .57 .80 .62 .88 1.07 .80 1.27 .70 .46 .79
IN T4 .60 .48 .41 .67 .51 .64 .88 .62 .89 1.28 .68 .90
HI T4 .52 .65 .32 .54 .79 .45 .67 .90 .60 .90 1.35 .56
SCT T4 .60 .44 .58 .72 .51 .81 .88 .54 1.04 1.18 .76 1.37

Means: .05 .05 .08 -.17 -.66 -.07 -.05 -.95 .18 -.26 -1.51 .09

Note. Results based on standardized variance method of identification. Bold numbers on the diagonal are estimated variances. Covariances are below the diagonal and correlations are above. Latent means set to zero at T1 in order to establish metric; subsequent means therefore reflect change from T1. IN=inattention; HI=hyperactivity/impulsivity; SCT=sluggish cognitive tempo; T1=preschool; T2=post-1st grade; T3=post-4th grade; T4=post-9th grade.