Table A4.
Final GLMM and LMM models for the restricted data set
| Estimate±SE | z | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance at tables GLMM, N=225 | |||
| Corvid | 2.81±1.16 | 2.41 | 0.016 |
| Date | 0.03±0.01 | 3.13 | 0.002 |
| Litter*Corvid | −3.97±1.06 | −3.73 | <0.001 |
| Natural*Corvid | −2.71±1.07 | −2.54 | 0.011 |
| Novel*Corvid | −2.61±1.04 | −2.51 | 0.012 |
| Visit rate LMM, N=114 | |||
| Corvid | 2.25±0.46 | 4.88 | <0.001 |
| Date | 0.01±0.01 | 2.67 | 0.008 |
| Litter*Corvid | −0.58±0.44 | −1.33 | 0.183 |
| Natural*Corvid | 0.018±0.43 | 0.04 | 0.967 |
| Novel*Corvid | −1.36±0.40 | −3.40 | <0.001 |
| Feeding rate LMM, N=114 | |||
| Corvid | 3.06±0.41 | 7.44 | <0.001 |
| Litter*Corvid | −0.37±0.46 | −0.80 | 0.423 |
| Natural*Corvid | 0.19±0.46 | 0.41 | 0.684 |
| Novel*Corvid | −1.13±0.43 | −2.63 | 0.008 |
Data contained only the two species from each group that visited the most (jackdaws/rooks and blue tits/great tits). The control condition served as the reference category for all object conditions, noncorvids for species group and rural areas for habitat type. An asterisk denotes an interaction term.