Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Processes. 2016 Jun 11;129:68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.007

Table 4. Comparison of monkey performance in Evans et al. (2012) and the Experiment 3 trials with the Accumulation Task.

Mean Number Obtained
20 items, 2-second interval
Mean Number Obtained
50 items, 2-second interval

Evans et al. Phase 1 % Gain Evans et al. Phase 4 % Gain
Gabe 3.90 9.65 147% 5.38 16.2 201%
Griffin 3.20 6.85 114% 3.50 8.2 134%
Liam 6.00 13.80 130% 9.88 20.2 104%
Lily 14.60 18.80 29% 8.13 50.0 515%
Logan 9.70 13.50 39% 6.88 24.4 255%
Nala 2.30 3.80 65% NA NA NA
Wren 9.70 19.90 105% 10.94 21.0 92%

Note. This table only includes the individuals tested in both the current study and the Evans et al. (2012) study. Monkey Nala was not included in Phases 3 and 4 (50 items) in the current study due to her low performance levels in Phases 1 and 2.