Table 4. Comparison of monkey performance in Evans et al. (2012) and the Experiment 3 trials with the Accumulation Task.
| Mean Number Obtained 20 items, 2-second interval |
Mean Number Obtained 50 items, 2-second interval |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Evans et al. | Phase 1 | % Gain | Evans et al. | Phase 4 | % Gain | |
| Gabe | 3.90 | 9.65 | 147% | 5.38 | 16.2 | 201% |
| Griffin | 3.20 | 6.85 | 114% | 3.50 | 8.2 | 134% |
| Liam | 6.00 | 13.80 | 130% | 9.88 | 20.2 | 104% |
| Lily | 14.60 | 18.80 | 29% | 8.13 | 50.0 | 515% |
| Logan | 9.70 | 13.50 | 39% | 6.88 | 24.4 | 255% |
| Nala | 2.30 | 3.80 | 65% | NA | NA | NA |
| Wren | 9.70 | 19.90 | 105% | 10.94 | 21.0 | 92% |
Note. This table only includes the individuals tested in both the current study and the Evans et al. (2012) study. Monkey Nala was not included in Phases 3 and 4 (50 items) in the current study due to her low performance levels in Phases 1 and 2.