Table 4.
Treatment | (mg/kg) | NA (ng/g t) | NM (ng/g t) | [NM]/[NA] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hippocampus | ||||
Vehicle | 0 | 312 ± 15 | 14 ± 1.3 | 5 ± 0.4 |
EMD386088 | 2.5 | 324 ± 16 | 16 ± 0.9 | 5 ± 0.3 |
5 | 300 ± 22 | 15 ± 1.6 | 5 ± 0.4 | |
F(2, 21) = 0.46 NS |
F(2, 21) = 0.45 NS |
F(2, 21) = 0.31 NS |
||
Nucleus accumbens | ||||
Vehicle | 0 | 443 ± 48 | 15 ± 1.0.8 | 4 ± 0.1 |
EMD386088 | 2.5 | 443 ± 40 | 14 ± 0.8 | 4 ± 0.2 |
5 | 445 ± 47 | 13 ± 0.8 | 5 ± 0.1 | |
F(2, 21) = 0.01 NS |
F(2, 21) = 0.0 NS |
F(2, 21) = 0.99 NS |
EMD386088 was injected i.p. in a dose of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg; control group was treated i.p. with saline. The rats were decapitated about 30 min after drug injection. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (N = 8). The concentration of NA and its metabolite, normetanephrine (NM), was expressed as ng/g tissue. The rate of NA metabolism was expressed as the ratio of the extraneuronal metabolite NM to NA: [NM] / [NA] × 100. The indices were calculated using concentrations from individual tissue samples. The data were analyzed by means of one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan’s post hoc test
NS not significant