Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;10:338. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00338

Table 1.

Subject characteristics and total number of subjects per group, assessments and MRI technique (mean ± S.D.).

PT (n = 18) CT (n = 18) p-values
Age 64.0 ± 4.3 61.8 ± 3.3 0.20
Gender (M/F) 5/13 8/10 0.31
IQ 117.5 ± 9.9 121.6 ± 8.0 0.18
MoCA 27.8 ± 1.5 27.9 ± 1.4 0.82
TICS-M 30.7 ± 2.0 29.4 ± 2.2 0.08
VO2 Max 19.3 ± 3.3 20.7 ± 5.0 0.29
Participants (n)
  Cognitive exams 18 18
  Physical exams 18 18
  pCASL MRI 18 13
  HC BOLD MRI 14 12

PT, Physical Training; CT, Cognitive Training; IQ, Intelligence Quotient; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; TICS-M, Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status-Modified; pCASL MRI, pseudo Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling MRI; HC BOLD MRI, Hypercapnia Blood Oxygenated Level Dependent MRI. There was no difference between participants' demographic, p > 0.05.