Skip to main content
. 2016 May 28;67(11):3457–3469. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw167

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Gross morphology analyses of the wild-type (WT) and rml1 mutant. (A) Root and shoot phenotypes of 2-d-old wild-type and rml1 mutant plants. (B) Magnification of wild-type and rml1 mutant roots in (A). (C) Comparison of primary root growth after germination between wild-type and rml1 mutants (n=20). (D) Phenotypes of the wild-type and the rml1 mutant at the five-leaf stage when grown in the field. (E) Morphologies of the wild-type and rml1 mutant plants at heading. (F) Flag leaves of wild-type and rml1 plants at the heading stage. (G) Main panicles of the wild-type and rml1 mutant plants. Scale bars: 10mm (A, B, D, F, G); 10cm (E). Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01).