Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;1(4):212–224. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.23

Figure 4.

Figure 4

E and S components of sarcomatoid ccRCC show similar DNA copy number aberrations that differ from those of non‐sarcomatoid ccRCC. (A) Similar genome‐wide DNA copy number signature of E and S components of sarcomatoid ccRCC. (B) Distinct genome‐wide DNA copy number signature of sarcomatoid ccRCC versus advanced‐stage non‐sarcomatoid ccRCC (E*) TCGA cases. (C) Distinct genome‐wide DNA copy number signature of sarcomatoid ccRCC versus Fuhrman grade 4 non‐sarcomatoid ccRCC (E*) TCGA cases. Copy number alterations are mapped according to their chromosomal location on the x‐axis, with the y‐axis showing the percentage of cases that harbour these changes.