Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;11(7):517–525. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1187350

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of in vitro-derived predictors of response to therapy in a cohort of 88 normal karyotype AML patients.

  RFS (P-value) RFS (P-value) RD cycle1 RD cycle1
ICE 0.07   0.74  
V-ICE 0.005   0.06  
A-ICE 0.32   0.30  
AV-ICE 0.72   0.47  
DA 0.79   0.59  
Combined   0.048   0.02
BM Blasts 0.55 0.72 0.29 0.13
platelets 0.06 0.07 0.21 0.22
LDH 0.09 0.09 0.24 0.32
WBC 0.15 0.047 0.12 0.16
FLT3 ITD 0.02 0.048 0.31 0.49
FLT3 TKD 0.22 0.20 0.55 0.62
CEBPA 0.85 0.85 0.08 0.15
NPM1 0.72 0.91 0.0002 0.0002
Total model 0.002 0.002 0.045 0.018

Twenty-one patients had missing values for one or more of the clinical covariates or outcome measures used in the table. Patients were randomized to treatment with ICE, V-ICE, A-ICE or VA-ICE, and the predicted sensitivity to the treatment given was compared to clinical response after first treatment cycle, as well to relapse-free survival (RFS). P-values of association between predictors and outcome are shown. Combined uses a single score for each patient equal to the prediction score for the treatment given. Both V-ICE and the combined score are independent predictors of response, even when all other relevant factors are taken into account.