Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;11(6):438–448. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1176816

Table 2.

Differences in mean HDL-carried has-miR-223-3p and has-miR-135a-3p relative concentrations between the 3 experimental diets (n = 9).11

  HDL-miR-223-3p concentrations
HDL-miR-135a-3p concentrations
Group comparisons Ct ratio2 Fold change Friedman's test P value (and Padj value)3 Ct ratio2 Fold change Friedman's test P value (and Padj value)3
Control4 0.830 ± 0.055 1.046 0.459 (0.918) 0.621 ± 0.014 1.357 0.459 (0.918)
rTFA 0.830 ± 0.041     0.627 ± 0.030    
Control4 0.830 ± 0.055 −1.218   0.621 ± 0.014 1.094  
iTFA 0.819 ± 0.045     0.621 ± 0.018    
rTFA4 0.830 ± 0.041 −1.274   0.627 ± 0.030 −1.241  
iTFA 0.819 ± 0.045     0.621 ± 0.018    
1

Control: diet low in TFA from any source; Ct: cycle threshold; Padj: Bonferroni adjusted P-value for multiple testing; SD: standard deviation; iTFA: diet rich in TFA from industrial source; rTFA: diet rich in TFA from ruminant; TFA: trans fatty acids.

2

HDL-carried miRNA relative concentration or Ct ratio = miR-223-3p (or miR-135a-3p)/cel-miR-39 cycle threshold (Ct) ratio (1/x) values. Mean ± Standard deviation.

3

Differences in HDL-carried miRNA relative concentrations between the 3 diets were assessed using the Friedman's test, with Bonferroni adjusted P values for multiple testing. Adjusted P value = Friedman's test P value multiplied by 2 independent tests performed (2 miRNAs tested). Means were considered significantly different between diets at Padj ≤ 0.05.

4

Group to which the data are compared for the fold change calculation for each diet pair.