Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;12:1085–1092. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S107991

Table 2.

Association between the iceA1 status and clinical outcomes

Group/subgroup OR (95% CI) P-value I2 (%) Phet Analysis model
Total
PUD vs gastritis/NUD 1.28 (1.03, 1.60) 0.03 0 0.92 FE
GC vs gastritis/NUD 1.05 (0.78, 1.40) 0.75 25 0.19 FE
GC vs PUD 0.88 (0.64, 1.19) 0.40 3 0.42 FE
People’s Republic of China
PUD vs gastritis/NUD 1.40 (1.07, 1.83) 0.01 0 0.69 FE
GC vs gastritis/NUD 1.30 (0.89, 1.89) 0.17 35 0.15 FE
GC vs PUD 0.85 (0.57, 1.26) 0.42 34 0.15 FE
Other countries
PUD vs gastritis/NUD 1.07 (0.73, 1.57) 0.73 0 0.98 FE
GC vs gastritis/NUD 0.74 (0.46, 1.20) 0.22 0 0.50 FE
GC vs PUD 0.92 (0.56, 1.49) 0.73 0 0.34 FE

Abbreviations: PUD, peptic ulcer disease; NUD, nonulcer dyspepsia; GC, gastric carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; I2, I-squared; Phet, P-value for heterogeneity test; FE, fixed-effect model; CI, confidence interval.