Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;14(2):1617–1623. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5404

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of prognostic factors for DFS in HCC.

Variable Patient number Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Tumor size (cm) 159 0.600
 ≤5 1 1
 >5 2.078 (1.467–2.942) 0.000 1.348 (0.607–2.995)
Tumor nodules 159 0.092
 Solitary 1 1
 Multiple 2.371 (1.542–3.647) 0.000 1.206 (0.836–3.641)
Capsular formation 154 0.104
 Absence 1
 Presence 0.753 (0.532–1.065) 0.109 0.732 (0.503–1.066)
Microscopic vascular invasion 157 0.003
 Absence 1 1
 Presence 2.737 (1.900–3.943) 0.000 2.033 (1.357–3.046)
Serum α-fetoprotein level (ng/ml) 149 0.090
 ≤400 1 1
 >400 1.495 (1.037–2.154) 0.031 1.306 (0.893–1.909)
Edmondson-steiner grade 158 0.527
 1,2 1 1
 3,4 1.027 (0.969–1.089) 0.374 1.024 (0.952–1.101)
BCLC stage 159 0.451
 A 1 1
 B 2.355 (1.654–3.354) 0.000 1.329 (0.581–3.040)
MBD2 expression 159 0.022
 Negative 1 1
 Positive 2.128 (1.485–3.049) 0.000 1.513 (1.018–2.248)

OS, overall survival; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MBD2, methyl-CpG binding domain 2.