Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2016 Jul 9;29(1):128–148. doi: 10.1177/0898264315624909

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models Testing the Effects of Visual Acuity and Self-Reported Vision Status on Social Support Indicators (NHANES IV, 1999–2008, Weighted).

Indicator N (Models 0/1/2/3/4) Vision status Model 0a
Model 1b
Model 2c
Model 3d
Model 4e
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Marital status (7,512, 7,502, 7,457, 7,398, 7,381) Low 1.82a [1.53, 2.17] 1.59a [1.33, 1.90] 1.57a [1.31, 1.88] 1.51a [1.26, 1.81] 1.46a [1.24, 1.80]
Blind 2.39a [1.57, 3.64] 2.03a [1.31, 3.13] 2.00a [1.31, 3.06] 1.84a [1.22, 2.79] 1.86a [1.23, 2.82]
Fair 1.44a [1.23, 1.68] 1.25a [1.05, 1.49] 1.24a [1.04, 1.48] 1.19a [1.00, 1.42] 1.19a [1.00, 1.41]
Poor 1.92a [1.45, 2.55] 1.59a [1.19, 2.12] 1.52a [1.13, 2.03] 1.36a [1.02, 1.83] 1.36a [1.00, 1.83]
Emotional support (7,626, 7,492, 7,447, 7,388, 7,371) Low 1.26 [1.04, 1.52] 1.11 [0.92, 1.32] 1.11 [0.93, 1.33] 1.09 [0.91, 1.30] 1.08 [0.89, 1.29]
Blind 0.86 [0.47, 1.60] 0.80 [0.43, 1.48] 0.83 [0.45, 1.55] 0.85 [0.45, 1.59] 0.81 [0.43, 1.55]
Fair 1.61a [1.31, 1.98] 1.47a [1.18, 1.82] 1.40a [1.13, 2.71] 1.23a [1.00, 1.51] 1.21 [0.99, 1.49]
Poor 2.40a [1.70, 3.39] 2.06a [1.44, 2.94] 1.89a [1.32, 2.71] 1.57a [1.08, 2.28] 1.47a [1.01, 2.14]
Financial support (7,541, 7,408, 7,365, 7,309, 7,292) Low 0.95 [0.79, 1.15] 0.97 [0.80, 1.17] 0.97 [0.80, 1.18] 0.94 [0.77, 1.13] 0.94 [0.78, 1.14]
Blind 0.53a [0.31, 0.90] 0.53a [0.31, 0.92] 0.51a [0.29, 0.90] 0.44a [0.25, 0.79] 0.44a [0.25, 0.78]
Fair 1.16 [0.96, 1.40] 1.13 [0.93, 1.38] 1.09 [0.90, 1.31] 0.99 [0.83, 1.19] 1 [0.83, 1.20]
Poor 1.59a [1.22, 2.07] 1.50a [1.15, 1.96] 1.35a [1.02, 1.79] 1.18 [0.87, 1.59] 1.19 [0.88, 1.62]
≥1 friend (7,562, 7,432, 7,388, 7,329, 7,315) Low 1.36 [0.89, 2.08] 1.06 [0.69, 1.63] 1.04 [0.68, 1.59] 1.03 [0.67, 1.59] 1.04 [0.68, 1.56]
Blind 1.17 [0.50, 2.72] 1.05 [0.45, 2.42] 1.06 [0.46, 2.48] 1.06 [0.44, 2.52] 1.03 [0.44, 2.39]
Fair 2.16a [1.52, 3.07] 1.69a [1.15, 2.49] 1.70a [1.15, 2.51] 1.61a [1.11, 2.33] 1.59 [1.11, 2.29]
Poor 2.41 [1.48, 3.91] 1.55 [0.91, 2.65] 1.55 [0.91, 2.61] 1.39 [0.83, 2.34] 1.27 [0.76, 2.12]
SIS (7,350, 7,340, 7,297, 7,241, 7,227) Low 1.43a [1.21, 1.69] 1.27a [1.08, 1.49] 1.26a [1.07, 1.48] 1.21a [1.03, 1.43] 1.21a [1.02, 1.43]
Blind 1.11 [0.65, 1.89] 1.01 [0.60, 1.69] 1.00 [0.60, 1.69] 0.89 [0.53, 1.51] 0.9 [0.53, 1.53]
Fair 1.69a [1.37, 2.08] 1.46a [1.17, 1.81] 1.39a [1.12, 1.73] 1.23 [0.99, 1.52] 1.22 [0.99, 1.51]
Poor 2.54a [1.88, 3.43] 2.10a [1.54, 287] 1.89a [1.37, 2.61] 1.56a [1.10, 2.21] 1.53a [1.08, 2.16]

Note. OR with “Normal” and “Good” self-reported vision as the reference groups. Bold entries significant at p ≤ .05. Subscripts indicate statistical differences between models. NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; SIS = social isolation score.

a

Model 0 controlled only visual acuity and self-reported vision (i.e., vision status).

b

Model 1 controlled vision status and sociodemographic variables (i.e., age category, gender, race, education).

c

Model 2 controlled vision status, sociodemographic variables, and chronic diseases.

d

Model 3 controlled vision status, sociodemographic variables, chronic diseases, and functional difficulty.

e

Model 4 controlled vision status, sociodemographic variables, chronic diseases, functional difficulty, and disability.