Skip to main content
. 2016 May 19;17(4):357–370. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0572-x

Table 2.

Component pair amplitude and latency statistics

Amplitude Latency
P13-N19 N19-P30 P30-N40 N40-P50 P13-N19 N19-P30 P30-N40 N40-P50
Hemi (L vs. R) 7.9* 6.2* 5.5* 19.2** 2.9, n.s. 0.9, n.s. 3.4· 1.0, n.s.
Type (M vs. B) 29.4*** 20.6** 0.8, n.s. 1.5, n.s. 4.1· 8.7* 25.3** 0.2, n.s.
Side (C vs. I) 2.0, n.s. 14.6** 0.9, n.s. 10.7* 20.2** 2.9, n.s. 22.0** 0.0, n.s.
Hemi × type 11.8* 0.8, n.s. 0.6, n.s. 0.1, n.s. 1.6, n.s. 1.8, n.s. 0.2, n.s. 0.1, n.s.
Hemi × side 1.2, n.s. 0.1, n.s. 0.2, n.s. 0.9, n.s. 0.5, n.s. 0.1, n.s. 0.4, n.s. 0.3, n.s.
Type × side 2.0, n.s. 19.3** 0.1, n.s. 8.9* 13.8** 3.5· 9.8* 0.7, n.s.
3-way interaction 1.5, n.s. 0.1, n.s. 0.2, n.s. 0.5, n.s. 0.9, n.s. 0.0, n.s. 0.3, n.s. 0.0, n.s.

The value in each cell represents an F value with 1 and 9 ° of freedom in the numerator and denominator, respectively (i.e., F 1,9), reflecting the fact that there were two levels in each factor and 10 participants. Hemisphere: right vs. left. Type: monaural vs. binaural. Side: contralateral vs. ipsilateral

·P < 0.1; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001