Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 12;7:1057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01057

Table 4.

Results of Study 2 multivariate analysis of variance using manipulated threat associated with police officers to predict support for policing policy reform items.

Police threat prime Adjusted R2
F p2 ηp2
Scrutiny (a) 0.036
             (b) 0.38 0.541 0.00 −0.005
             (c) 0.21 0.645 0.00 0.029
Cameras (a) −0.012
              (b) 3.01 0.085 0.02 0.016
              (c) 3.21 0.076 0.03 0.008
Demo matching (a) 0.011
                        (b) 0.30 0.578 0.00 −0.006
                        (c) 0.46 0.500 0.00 0.006
Lethal Force (a) −0.011
                    (b) 0.88 0.351 0.01 −0.001
                    (c) 2.25 0.137 0.02 0.000

Model 1 (a) includes only the demographic covariates (age, race, ethnicity, and gender), model 2 (b) contains only the threat manipulation, and model 3 (c) includes the threat manipulation, controlling for demographic covariates.