Table 2.
Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for mortality according to well-being and other variables.
| Adjusted for age, sex, and years of education | Final model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | p | HR | 95% CI | p | |
| Positive affect | 0.85 | 0.75–0.97 | 0.012 | 0.87 | 0.73–1.03 | 0.09 |
| Negative affect | 1.17 | 1.01–1.37 | 0.047 | 0.98 | 0.81–1.19 | 0.83 |
| Evaluative well-being | 0.84 | 0.77–0.91 | < 0.001 | 1.05 | 0.93–1.16 | 0.46 |
| Health status | 0.94 | 0.92–0.95 | < 0.001 | 0.95 | 0.93–0.97 | < 0.001 |
| Physical multimorbidity (ref. No) | 1.32 | 0.97–1.79 | 0.08 | 0.82 | 0.57–1.19 | 0.29 |
| Body mass index (ref. normal) | ||||||
| Underweight | 6.93 | 2.45–19.63 | < 0.001 | 5.47 | 1.88–15.94 | 0.002 |
| Overweight/obesity | 0.72 | 0.48–1.06 | 0.09 | 0.70 | 0.47–1.04 | 0.08 |
| Physical activity (ref. high) | ||||||
| Moderate | 1.48 | 0.93–2.36 | 0.10 | 1.40 | 0.87–2.25 | 0.17 |
| Low | 2.40 | 1.54–3.74 | < 0.001 | 1.28 | 0.78–2.09 | 0.33 |
| Daily fruit and vegetable intake (ref. less than 5 servings) | 0.82 | 0.58–1.16 | 0.26 | – | – | – |
| Tobacco consumption (ref. never smoker) | 1.44 | 1.02–2.03 | 0.040 | 1.31 | 0.90–1.93 | 0.16 |
| Heavy alcohol consumption (ref. No) | 0.28 | 0.04–1.99 | 0.21 | – | – | – |
| Married or in partnership (ref. No) | 0.73 | 0.52–1.01 | 0.06 | 0.84 | 0.58–1.21 | 0.35 |
| Residential setting (ref. rural) | 1.17 | 0.75–1.84 | 0.49 | – | – | – |
| Household income (ref. first or second quintile of income) | 0.94 | 0.68–1.29 | 0.70 | – | – | – |
| Sex (ref. male) | – | – | – | 0.34 | 0.23–0.51 | < 0.001 |
| Age | – | – | – | 1.08 | 1.07–1.10 | < 0.001 |
| Years of education | – | – | – | 0.98 | 0.95–1.01 | 0.25 |
A first model assessed the association of each variable with mortality, adjusting only for age, sex and years of education. The final model additionally included the covariates with a p-value < 0.1 in the first model. Positive affect and negative affect scores ranged between 0 and 6, with higher scores indicating higher positive affect and negative affect, respectively. Evaluative well-being ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating higher evaluative well-being. The HR corresponding to the three well-being variables indicates the increase/decrease in the risk of mortality per one unit increased.