Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 12;3(3):031414. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031414

Table 1.

NIRS-mediated BCI studies utilizing motor imagery signals.

Reference Brain area Features Classification accuracy (%)
NIRS-based system
Coyle et al.50 Motor cortex HbO value 75
Coyle et al.51 Motor cortex HbO value 70 to 90
Sitaram et al.52 Bil motor cortex Mean of ΔHbO and HbR 89.1
Holper and Wolf53 Secondary motor cortex HbO signals (mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) 81
Naseer and Hong54 Bil motor cortex HbO signals (mean and slope of ΔHbO) 87.2
Hong et al.55 Motor cortex and PFC HbO signals (mean and slope of ΔHbO) 75.7 (three class: right/left/arithmetic)
EEG-NIRS hybrid system
Fazli et al.56 Bil motor cortex NIRS: mean of ΔHbO and HbR EEG: power 83.1
Koo et al.57 Bil motor cortex NIRS: ΔHbO EEG: power and variance 88 (self-paced)
Yin et al.58 Bil motor cortex NIRS: signals from HbR, HbO, HbT, HbO-HbR, light absorption (two wavelengths) EEG: power, instantaneous phase, instantaneous amplitude, and instantaneous frequency 89
Buccino et al.59 Bil motor cortex NIRS: mean and slope of ΔHbO and HbR EEG: power and variance 72.2 (right/left)

Note: PFC, prefrontal cortex; HbO, oxygenated hemoglobin; HbR, deoxygenated hemoglobin; and HbT, total hemoglobin.