Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;106(8):1463–1469. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303212

TABLE 3—

Adjusted Odds Ratio of Access to Health Care Comparing Living in a Rural Area to an Urban Area by Race/Ethnicity: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, United States, 2005–2010

Outcome Rural,a AORb (95% CI)
Usual source of health care
 All 1.52 (1.29, 1.78)
 Non-Hispanic White 1.55 (1.30, 1.86)
 Non-Hispanic African American 1.29 (0.91, 1.84)
 Hispanic 1.28 (0.86, 1.88)
Health care needs met
 All 1.15 (0.98, 1.35)
 Non-Hispanic White 1.12 (0.94, 1.33)
 Non-Hispanic African American 1.35 (0.84, 2.16)
 Hispanic 1.06 (0.70, 1.62)
Cholesterol screening
 All 0.62 (0.51, 0.74)
 Non-Hispanic White 0.66 (0.53, 0.81)
 Non-Hispanic African American 0.37 (0.25, 0.57)
 Hispanic 0.63 (0.35, 1.15)
Cervical screening
 All 0.79 (0.65, 0.96)
 Non-Hispanic White 0.76 (0.62, 0.95)
 Non-Hispanic African American 0.48 (0.29, 0.80)
 Hispanic 0.89 (0.58, 1.36)
Dental visit
 All 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)
 Non-Hispanic White 0.76 (0.66, 0.88)
 Non-Hispanic African American 0.97 (0.71, 1.34)
 Hispanic 0.74 (0.51, 1.07)

Note. All = White, African American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other race; AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Weighted data.

a

Reference group = urban.

b

AOR derived from a 3-level random intercept model, which controls for primary care physicians per 10 000 population, hospital beds per 10 000 population, tract-level percentage of residents at or below the federal poverty level, gender, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational attainment, poverty, unemployment, insurance status, self-reported health, number of chronic conditions, out-of-pocket medical expenses, English proficiency, survey year, and region.