Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 6;7(13):15566–15576. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7216

Table 4. The prognostic significance of CA-125 normalization in ovarian CCC.

CA-125 normalization No. (%) FIGO stage (%) CRS (%) RFS OS
I+II III+IV P valuea Optimal Suboptimal P valueb 5-year RFS(%) P valuec 5-year OS(%) P valuec
Pretreament 76 (20.3) 63 (82.9) 13 (17.1) Referrence 76 (100) 0 (0) Referrence 90.1 Referrence 94.0 Referrence
Between cycles 1 and 2 69 (18.4) 55 (79.7) 14 (20.3) 0.623 66 (95.7) 3 (4.3) 0.103 82.1 0.327 95.2 0.654
Between cycles 2 and 3 63 (16.8) 42 (66.7) 21 (33.3) 0.027 57 (90.5) 6 (9.5) 0.008 76.2 0.013 88.7 0.030
Between cycles 3 and 4 50 (13.3) 30 (60.0) 20 (40.0) 0.004 45 (90.0) 5 (10.0) 0.009 51.0 <0.001 79.0 0.003
Between cycles 4 and 6 48 (12.8) 21 (43.8) 27 (56.1) <0.001 42 (87.5) 6 (12.5) 0.003 15.2 <0.001 64.4 <0.001
After 6 cycles 44 (11.7) 12 (27.3) 32 (72.7) <0.001 38 (86.4) 6 (13.6) 0.002 2.3 <0.001 50.1 <0.001
No normalized 25 (6.7) 0 (0) 25 (100) <0.001b 13 (52.0) 12 (48.0) <0.001 - - 36.7 <0.001

Note:

a

Chi-square test

b

Fisher's exact test

C

Log rank test.