Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;7(13):16895–16909. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7815

Table 1. A comparison of the current method iACP with hajisharifi et al.'s method [16] on the same benchmark dataset (Online Supporting Information S1).

Prediction method Validation method Snc (%) Spc (%) Accc (%) MCCc
iACPa Jackknife test 89.86 98.54 95.06 0.897
5-fold cross-validation 88.40 99.02 94.77 0.893
Hajisharifi et al.b 5-fold cross-validation 89.70 85.18 92.68 0.784
a

Proposed in this paper.

b

See ref. [16].

c

See the section of “A set of four metrics”.