Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 25;7(13):17074–17086. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7717

Table 1. Correlative analysis of CRMP4 expression levels and clinical characteristics of gastric tumors.

Clinicalcharacteristics Casenumber CRMP4 X2 P-Value
high(n, %) low(n, %)
Gender 1.124 0.289
 Male 104 60(57.7) 44(42.3)
 Female 61 30(49.2) 31(50.8)
Age 0.542 0.462
 ≤60 104 59(56.7) 45(43.3)
 >60 61 31(50.8) 30(49.2)
Lymph node metastasis 7.998 0.005
 No 58 23(39.7) 35(60.3)
 Yes 107 67(62.6) 40(37.4)
TNM stage 10.792 0.013
 I 31 11(35.5) 20(64.5)
 II 24 10(41.7) 14(58.3)
 III 50 28(56.0) 22(44.0)
 IV 60 41(68.3) 19(31.7)
Tumor differentiation 9.000 0.003
 High and medium 45 16(35.6) 29(64.4)
 Low and none 120 74(61.7) 46(38.3)
Tumor size 0.207 0.649
 ≤4cm 87 46(52.9) 41(47.1)
 >4cm 78 44(56.4) 34(43.6)

Correlation between CRMP4 expression and the clinical characteristics of gastric cancer patients using the X2 test.