Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 12;6:29236. doi: 10.1038/srep29236

Table 3. Stability analysis of fourteen candidate ICGs using NormFinder analysis.

Sample sets Different strains set (A)
Different fruiting body developmental stages set (B)
Different growth stages set (C)
Total samples set (D)
Rank Gene Stabilityvalue Gene Stabilityvalue Gene Stabilityvalue Gene Stabilityvalue
1 SPRYp 0.049 SPRYp 0.078 SPRYp 0.071 SPRYp 0.094
2 ACTB 0.057 Vps26 0.131 Ras 0.208 Vps26 0.204
3 HH3 0.074 Ras 0.209 Vps26 0.219 Ras 0.209
4 L-asp 0.154 L-asp 0.240 UBQ 0.287 UBQ 0.279
5 Ras 0.175 β-TUB2 0.241 HH3 0.341 HH3 0.284
6 β-TUB1 0.178 18S 0.320 β-TUB2 0.363 β-TUB2 0.532
7 UBQ 0.273 UBQ 0.346 L-asp 0.517 L-asp 0.554
8 β-TUB2 0.316 HH3 0.393 18S 0.518 MSF1 0.636
9 α-TUB 0.335 GAPDH 0.505 MSF1 0.653 ACTB 0.749
10 MSF1 0.424 β-TUB1 0.582 β-TUB1 0.661 β-TUB1 0.780
11 CYP 0.442 MSF1 0.670 α-TUB 0.794 18S 0.849
12 Vps26 0.444 α-TUB 0.786 ACTB 0.811 α-TUB 0.886
13 GAPDH 0.458 ACTB 0.812 GAPDH 1.011 GAPDH 1.231
14 18S 0.587 CYP 1.077 CYP 1.192 CYP 1.300